Tweeted by Cat Dumas.

Sarcasm isn’t exactly lost on the Internet. Smashing Magazine tweeted this pic today, showing the W3C laying a Twitter-sarcasm smackdown — I guess they’re not quite as dry a group of nerds as I thought they were — and it had me laughing. Then I read that a company in Michigan is now trying to sell a sarcasm punctuation mark.

That’s right. Sell. They want $1.99 for it. A punctuation mark that they made up. I’m not kidding you, it’s all right here, as reported by the Telegraph.

Behold, in all its stupidity: The “SarcMark”

Alright, SarkMark, I’ll tell you how I really feel: You’re idiots. Getting past the glaringly obvious fact that there is absolutely no need for a punctuation mark to denote sarcasm, the mark looks like shit. Honestly, it looks like a third-grader drew it, on a napkin, on a park bench. It pains me to think that these people are actually trying to sell this garbage, and it pains me even more that they’re actually attempting to patent the thing.

The reasoning put forth by these geniuses: That people need some way to more concretely convey their sarcasm over the Internet. According to them, we should cater to people who are too stupid to either write sarcastically, or to understand sarcasm when it’s staring them in the face. Their slogan:

Never again be misunderstood! Never again waste a good sarcastic line on someone who doesn’t get it! Sarcasm – Punctuate It – SarcMark [X]

The [X] at the end of the slogan is where their ridiculous looking punctuation mark goes, but since you have to pay them to download it, nobody can see the mark unless they’ve installed it. This makes me happy, since it means the likelihood of ever seeing the horrid thing is slim. Normally I’d cross my fingers and hope that a thing like this fails, hard, but I don’t think these people stand a chance. Check out their hilariously skeezy site here.

Images: RunLevel6, Telegraph.

Yes, they’ve finally done it. After months of talk about incorporating the mounds of real-time data to which Google has access, they’re finally piping it all into their own search results. The sources they listed are some pretty big names: Facebook, Twitter, FriendFeed, MySpace, and Jaiku, among others — and that’s not counting the major media outlets they’ve also tapped to glean time-sensitive information.

See the official release for more details.

Annoyingly, of course, all anyone can say about this (aside from it’s about damn time) is that “Bing must be nudging them to be more competitive.” I can’t help but recall the fact that Google was in talks with Twitter regarding real-time search results several months before Bing ever existed.

Yep, completely and utterly missing. It’s been the better part of a day without the much-maligned pile of fail feature that Twitter’s massive ego of a CEO insisted we’d all grow to love — and they’ve not said a word about it. Unfortunately, because of their noted silence on the matter, the odds are about 50/50 that the horrid thing will be back tomorrow, bright eyed and bushy-tailed. I believe this to be the likeliest case because it’s what I don’t want to happen.

I’m still crossing my fingers.

We mustn’t discount the possibility that Twitter may actually have killed the beast, once and for all. I wouldn’t count on it — there’s that whole sticky issue of Twitter’s self-affirming infallibility being at stake here, after all.

[UPDATE]:

After hours of pleasing me with their absence, Twitter’s foul retweets are back. It was nice while it lasted.

Yes, those are “stacks” of “benjamins.”

His Twitter page was hilarious enough as it was without the G-Money MySpace retard-shot he has plastered as a background image. The MySpace theme runs throughout his scam-site too, including badges that lead back to his profile. And this really hits the mark; nothing says gaudy like a sleazy MySpace page…

WARNING: MySpace pages have been known to lower IQ, view at your own risk.

This guy is amazing. At the end of his MySpace youtube video, he gets in his Nissan 350Z and drives off, and yes, the camera keeps running until he drives down the street. He has two separate youtube videos, one for his MySpace and one as a greeter for his site. I’m sure he’d have one for Twitter as well, if he could. But these profile pages are just runners up compared to the grand-daddy of them all, his actual website.

Behold, in all its trashy glory: MiragesMoney.com

After laughing at his ridiculous Twitter background image for a solid five minutes, I clicked the link to his website, where I sat and laughed for another solid five minutes. Then I watched his terribad, self-promotional youtube video that he uses for a site-greeter, and laughed for another five minutes, and then it just got better as I clicked through to see the “Success Guide” portion of his site.

The Success Guide

This is truly hilarious; it’s his step-by-step guide to “become a baller.” Seriously.

From the guide intro:

Alright alright, so you want to pursure this make money from home thing and you want to stack $$$ like Mirage huh? You got some work to do. But hey, if Mirage can stack thousands a day then so can you. So here it is you wanna be ballers, the ultimate guide to making money online. Aka the success guide. I don’t know why Mirage did it, but I guess he just has a sweet spot in his heart for those who are struggling like he was. Now dont even think about jumping ahead in any section! Read each section diligently, join the networks he tells you to and structure everything the way he teaches and start ballin.

It only gets better from there, including a life history, written in nearly seventh-grade reading level, and many, many paragraphs of juicy internet-marketing secrets. This guy lays it all bare for the world to see, so that we can all become ballers just like him. Go ahead, cruise his pages, it’s good for about 20 minutes of uninterrupted laughter. When you’re finished, just be sure to gouge out your eyes, burn your computer, and lament the sad state of humanity to which the world has now bore witness.

After rolling out their lackluster new retweet feature not but one day ago, Twitter today announced that it’s been “temporarily disabled.” According to Twitter, they’re simply working on “a few problems” that have occurred during the rollout.

Twitter: Here’s Your Problem

Nobody likes your failed feature. The fix is simple, just remove it and act like it never happened. That’s how everyone else is acting, because it’s garbage. Thanks.

[UPDATE] Richard Barley, Community Manager for TweetDeck, was kind enough to stop by and clarify the issue last night, via comment. He made assurances that TweetDeck servers are secure, and suggested that the likely culprit here is in fact Brizzly. Apparently, in enacting their own list compatibility, Brizzly caused pre-existing groups to update back on Twitter’s servers. Now, I haven’t used Brizzly since it opened, but the first thing I did in testing the service was mirror my TweetDeck groups. All the pieces fall into place. That being said, the only thing missing is an explanation for why TweetDeck is so damn bad at syncing its groups and searches. That being said, TweetDeck is still the best client out there, because of its groups and search features.

- – - Original Text Follows – - -

I awoke this morning to find that Twitter had altered lists to include TweetDeck groups I’ve saved over the past year. These lists are in name only, meaning that they showed up, marked private, bearing the names of lists that I’ve used in TweetDeck but containing no names. If there had been a direct import without my knowledge, I may not have been so annoyed; this is as pointless as it is inappropriate.

Zombie Groups become Zombie Lists.

Last night I had written about the uselessness of lists, and how they’re nothing more than half-assed mimicry of a standard feature that full-fledged clients like TweetDeck or Seesmic have enjoyed for quite some time now. I talked about the sole use of lists, as far as Twitter’s concerned, as being a way to add functionality to the terminally hopeless web interface. I said that Twitter was likely pushing to bring that interface to a level of prominence that it’s never known before, as part of their overall effort to monetize the free service.

What I never suspected was that Twitter would resurrect long-dead and buried groups from the tombs of TweetDeck’s mystery-servers. Seriously, we all know that TweetDeck’s “servers” are about as likely to be hamster-farms as rack-farms — the things are notoriously out of date. That being said, what the hell is Twitter doing grabbing groups off somebody else’s servers, let alone groups that were deleted months ago by the user?

If this isn’t ringing any alarm bells yet, think of it this way: This is the same as an email provider reaching into your email account while you’re asleep, grabbing info from other mail accounts you have forwarding there from outside companies, and then presenting you with a flashy new inbox the next morning that happens to include data gleaned from the intrusion. You never asked them for this, nor did you give permission for it. Not so innocent.

What Gives Them the Right?

The sudden appearance of my TweetDeck groups in my Twitter account’s lists this morning left me more than a little perturbed. Now, I may be wrong, and TweetDeck may have a much deeper connection to Twitter than either company has ever let on, but this feels wrong. This feels like Twitter reached into TweetDeck servers and used their control over our accounts to simply pluck our information out. Information they then use to bolster their lists in an attempt to lure naysayers who don’t know any better.

These new lists then show up alongside all your other lists as private, and count against the arbitrarily imposed 20 list cap.

You can DELETE them.

Another change that’s either brand new, or not widely known: Twitter’s now allowing users to both edit and delete lists. This change is likely due to the use of lists by media outlets like the New York Times during the recent Ft. Hood shootings. Either way, this most basic functionality is a welcome addition.