<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EndofWeb &#187; social-media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://endofweb.co.uk/category/social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://endofweb.co.uk</link>
	<description>This is how the Web will end.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:17:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://endofweb.co.uk/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook and Privacy: a Neverending Story</title>
		<link>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/12/facebook-and-privacy-neverending-story/</link>
		<comments>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/12/facebook-and-privacy-neverending-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Rogers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.endofweb.co.uk/?p=1184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems they&#8217;ll never learn. Yesterday, this pop-up introduced itself to Facebook users across the globe, and it wasn&#8217;t to the warmest of welcomes, either. Out of the millions of users who see this pop-up, roughly half can be expected to actually follow through with the indoctrination into new privacy features, while the rest will [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/12/facebook-and-privacy-neverending-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Search to Incorporate Real-Time Data</title>
		<link>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/12/google-search-to-incorporate-real-time-data/</link>
		<comments>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/12/google-search-to-incorporate-real-time-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 05:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Rogers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[win]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.endofweb.co.uk/?p=1180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, they&#8217;ve finally done it. After months of talk about incorporating the mounds of real-time data to which Google has access, they&#8217;re finally piping it all into their own search results. The sources they listed are some pretty big names: Facebook, Twitter, FriendFeed, MySpace, and Jaiku, among others &#8212; and that&#8217;s not counting the major [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/12/google-search-to-incorporate-real-time-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Really, Mashable?</title>
		<link>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/11/really-mashable/</link>
		<comments>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/11/really-mashable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Rogers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mashable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.endofweb.co.uk/?p=1041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Responsible reporting starts with what you choose to report, and turning something as toxic as Facebook games into high-traffic news is beyond ridiculous. Slow days happen, but there are better things to talk about than this garbage. Some more app-pandering filth: Top 10 Facebook Applications for Music Lovers The Top 10 Facebook Apps [Poll Results] [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/11/really-mashable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[Update: NO] Twitter Lists Now Incorporating TweetDeck Groups?</title>
		<link>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/11/twitter-lists-now-incorporating-tweetdeck-groups/</link>
		<comments>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/11/twitter-lists-now-incorporating-tweetdeck-groups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Rogers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweetdeck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter lists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.endofweb.co.uk/?p=994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[UPDATE] Richard Barley, Community Manager for TweetDeck, was kind enough to stop by and clarify the issue last night, via comment. He made assurances that TweetDeck servers are secure, and suggested that the likely culprit here is in fact Brizzly. Apparently, in enacting their own list compatibility, Brizzly caused pre-existing groups to update back on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/11/twitter-lists-now-incorporating-tweetdeck-groups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Twitter Lists Don&#039;t Make Sense</title>
		<link>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/11/twitter_lists_bad_wrong_badong/</link>
		<comments>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/11/twitter_lists_bad_wrong_badong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Rogers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ft. hood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mashable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ny times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter lists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.endofweb.co.uk/?p=943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week has been utterly ruined by the uproarious debut of Twitter&#8217;s new Lists feature, and if you can&#8217;t already tell &#8212; I don&#8217;t like them. Here&#8217;s the issue with lists: They&#8217;re unnecessary. A Twitter list is nothing more than a group column in Tweetdeck or Seesmic Desktop. Only, these are meant to be public, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/11/twitter_lists_bad_wrong_badong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trashing Up Twitter (more): Donald Trump??</title>
		<link>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/09/trashing-up-twitter-more-donald-trump/</link>
		<comments>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/09/trashing-up-twitter-more-donald-trump/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Rogers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[donald trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.endofweb.co.uk/?p=760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image via Twitter Search I&#8217;ve recently noticed a disparaging spike in twitter spam, and while that&#8217;s pretty much normal in and of itself, this time it&#8217;s different. Donald Trump seems to be named in at least one spam-tweet every minute, and it&#8217;s only getting worse. So, I got curious. Where do the spam links go? [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/09/trashing-up-twitter-more-donald-trump/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Celebrity Tweeting Done Right: Danny DeVito</title>
		<link>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/09/celebrity-tweeting-done-right-danny-devito/</link>
		<comments>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/09/celebrity-tweeting-done-right-danny-devito/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 02:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Rogers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[win]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.endofweb.co.uk/?p=708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[UPDATE]:This account has been verified. While the legitimacy of this account is still in question, I think it&#8217;s safe to say we&#8217;re all hoping that it&#8217;s really Danny DeVito. If it isn&#8217;t him, then I&#8217;m still fully behind this guy because he&#8217;s so amazingly awesome. If you&#8217;re still not quite sure, then take a look [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/09/celebrity-tweeting-done-right-danny-devito/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media Pushers on Twitter: Here&#039;s a Tip.</title>
		<link>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/08/social-media-pushers-on-twitter-heres-a-tip/</link>
		<comments>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/08/social-media-pushers-on-twitter-heres-a-tip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 22:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Rogers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.endofweb.co.uk/?p=488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Treating social-networking sites or services such as Facebook and Twitter as nothing more than tools may get your clients a modest amount of pageviews, but it&#8217;s really only making you the telemarketers of the Internet. That&#8217;s it. Nothing more.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/08/social-media-pushers-on-twitter-heres-a-tip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[UPDATED] Digg Hijacking Links, Diggbar Illegitimate</title>
		<link>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/07/digg_url_change/</link>
		<comments>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/07/digg_url_change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 11:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Rogers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.endofweb.co.uk/?p=276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[UPDATE]: Earlier today (Tues., 21 July), Jay Adelson posted an official statement on Digg&#8217;s blog detailing the company&#8217;s position on the diggbar issue. It reads as follows: Hey everyone, I wanted to clear up some confusion created over the past couple of days surrounding the DiggBar, specifically how Digg short URLs work. As we’ve stated [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/07/digg_url_change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook&#039;s Response to Uproar Over Ads</title>
		<link>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/07/facebook_ads_2/</link>
		<comments>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/07/facebook_ads_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 20:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Rogers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.endofweb.co.uk/?p=210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook&#8217;s received a lot of attention in the three days since I posted about their use of users&#8217; profile pictures in ads. Numerous blogs have covered the story since, including both DownloadSquad and Mashable, which invariably led to enough of a ruckus that Facebook felt inclined to address the matter. David Swain, of the Product [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://endofweb.co.uk/2009/07/facebook_ads_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

